Friday, June 25, 2021
U.S. NEWSELECTION 2020New Legal Memo Outlines How Texas Lawsuit Can be Resubmitted by the...

New Legal Memo Outlines How Texas Lawsuit Can be Resubmitted by the U.S. & Likely Allow Swing States to Appoint New Electors

Like the post? Why not make it Facebook official. ⇊

The new legal memo would essentially allow for invalidating the elector’s votes in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin.


By TCP News Staff


General Michael Flynn defense fund Fellow patriots, please listen to this short, inspiring message from General Flynn. General Michael Flynn exemplifies patriotism, courage, and love of God and country - despite some of his own countrymen relentlessly attacking him. Donations for his defense are greatly appreciated. If you can only give $5.00, please do so - every little bit helps. Thank you so much, and God bless. Letter from General Flynn. 

(TCP News)  The case made by the Supreme Court was that Texas lacked “standing” in the suit that they filed.  Two Reagan era lawyers compiled a memo stating that this is mistaken.

From The Western Journal:

You Might Like

In refusing to hear Texas v. Pennsylvania, the U.S. Supreme Court abdicated its constitutional duty to resolve a real and substantial controversy among states that was properly brought as an original action in that Court. As a result, the Court has come under intense criticism for having evaded the most important inter-state constitutional case brought to it in many decades, if not ever.

The Supreme Court has a duty to hear cases properly brought before it, and a duty to explain their decisions on said cases to We the People amongst others.  According to William J. Olson & Patrick M. McSweeney, the two constitutional attorneys who wrote the memo, SCOTUS failed, and failed miserably to carry out these duties.

Article II Section I (in part):

Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.

The Founding Fathers wisely decided and decreed that electors would be appointed by the state legislature, there is no room for change or misinterpretation in this clause.  No one outside the state’s legislative governing body has the legal (constitutional) authority to appoint in any way an elector for the votes submitted as part of the Electoral College.  Yet that is exactly what some states did, namely the four swing states.

A STRATEGY exists to re-submit the Texas challenge under the Electors Clause to the Supreme Court in a way that even that Court could not dare refuse to consider. Just because Texas did not persuade the Justices that what happens in Pennsylvania hurts Texas does not mean that the United States of America could not persuade the justices that when Pennsylvania violates the U.S. Constitution, it harms the nation. Article III, § 2, cl. 2 confers original jurisdiction on the Supreme Court in any case suit brought by the United States against a state. Thus, the United States can and should file suit against Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin. Like the Texas suit, that new suit would seek an order invalidating the appointment of the electors appointed by those four defendant States that refused to abide by the terms of the Presidential Electors Clause. That would leave it to the state legislatures in those four states to “appoint” electors — which is what the Constitution requires.

The central idea behind all of this is simple: these states in going outside constitutional law in the means by which they appointed their states electors – firstly violated the law.  Secondly, the ramifications of these decisions does NOT remain only in the states that so decided to commit these injustices.  Rather these un-constitutional decisions affect all of the U.S. as a whole.  When states that Trump was wining by a large margin are suddenly being won by Biden, there is a problem.  When the states electors were improperly chosen, there is a problem.

When those four States violated the Constitution by allowing electors who had not been appointed in the manner prescribed by the state legislature, the United States suffered an injury. Indeed, there could hardly have been a more significant injury to the nation than that which corrupted its Presidential election.

It is imperative that Trump immediately order the DoJ to file suit against Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin – our freedom depends on it.


Article sources:
The Western Journal
National Constitution Center

Viewpoints expressed herein are of the article’s author(s), or of the person(s) or organization(s) quoted or linked therein, and do not necessarily represent those of TCP News

What you can do to help:


It is vitally important that we all take the time to like and share articles regardless of what site you are on. Conservative sites (like this one) cannot count on traffic from Facebook etc. any more. Subscribing is also important; this bypasses the censorship. The more that we can get the word out the better – and in order to continue bringing you content like this – we ALL need traffic in order to survive. Sign up for desktop notifications (the red bell symbol). Running a website is not only expensive, it also takes a lot of time and effort.

No one likes ads, but very few people will donate, hence the reason most of us have ads.

Besides donating and clicking on ads, you can make a purchase from our store and buy my book.

Don't forget to follow TCP News on Parler, USA Life, Gab, Facebook, and Twitter

TCP News is proud to be ranked #24 in the Top 40 Conservative Political Blogs

Thank you for helping us grow, we appreciate it!


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related news