Home / FEATURED ARTICLES / Deplorable Hillary Uses Tragedy to Lie about Gun Suppressors

Deplorable Hillary Uses Tragedy to Lie about Gun Suppressors

What Finger News

By Onan Coca

Hillary Clinton isn’t the most politically astute person in the world. How else can you explain the constant losing?

She proved her idiocy again on Monday morning when in the immediate aftermath of the Las Vegas shooting she began calling for more gun control, and of a specific variety.

She wants to BAN “silencers.”

Why?

You Might Like

FOR THE LAST TIME:

You Might Like

This is NOT how SUPPRESSORS work. The gun would have still been incredibly loud. Why won’t the media tell the truth about suppressor technology? Why do they continue to allow Democrats to lie about how suppressors work, and what kind of sound they allow to escape the firearm?

https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/914859190589562880

The illegal firearm (Yes, the gun the Las Vegas shooter used to commit his crime was already BANNED) that the Vegas shooter used, would have sounded like a jackhammer on steroids if he would have used a suppressor. Meaning, the crowd would have still heard the gunshots.

Breitbart’s AWR Hawkins further explains:

In reality, suppressors do not eliminate the sound of a gunshot. Rather, they muffle that sharp, ear-piercing wave released from the end of the barrel when a gun is fired. The sound of the gunshot remains but the suppressor removes the aspect of the sound that damages the ear.

Clinton’s disgusting blame of the NRA, while simultaneously saying this isn’t a time “for politics,” is deplorable.

Everything Clinton has ever done has been done for political motivations. Including using this tragedy, which had nothing to do with suppressors, to politicize the gun control debate… again. Why is it that every time a Democrat calls for new laws banning guns, the laws they talk about passing don’t actually speak to the event that just took place.

If we had banned suppressors would Stephen Paddock have been stopped from committing his terrible violence? NO.

Why? Because suppressors are currently very difficult to obtain AND Paddock didn’t use one in his crime!

Yet, here is Hillary Clinton calling for new laws banning a product that didn’t have anything to do with the event.

It’s foolishness.

Republished with permission Constitution.com

Please Spread the Word and Share This Post

Viewpoints expressed herein are of the article’s author(s), or of the person(s) or organization(s) quoted or linked therein, and do not necessarily represent those of True Conservative Pundit

Subscribe to my daily newsletter, and join hundreds of daily readers and receive news and relevant commentary

Don't forget to follow True Conservative Pundit on Facebook, Gab, SpreelyUSA Life, and Twitter

If you value what you see on True Conservative Pundit, please consider donating, any amount helps

donate to TCP News

About Onan Coca

Onan is the Editor-in-Chief at Liberty Alliance media group. He's also the managing editor at Eaglerising.com, Constitution.com and the managing partner at iPatriot.com. You can read more of his writing at Eagle Rising. Onan is a graduate of Liberty University (2003) and earned his M.Ed. at Western Governors University in 2012. Onan lives in Atlanta with his wife and their three wonderful children.

Leave a comment - or not. We have NO tolerance for trolls, abusive and inflammatory comments, or those laced with profanity. No more than two links. Keep it clean and on point, or be banned.

x

Check Also

Headline News 12/05/2019

By TCP Staff “An Oasis in a world of fake news – ...