Friday, October 30, 2020
U.S. NEWS INTERNATIONALCOMMENTARY Here’s the Truth About 6 of Obama’s Iran Deal Claims

INTERNATIONALCOMMENTARY Here’s the Truth About 6 of Obama’s Iran Deal Claims

Like the post? Why not make it Facebook official. ⇊

 By Michaela Dodge on The Daily Signal

Months of Iranian pressure on the United States brought its fruition. Iran got a deal that legitimizes its nuclear program, rewards its defiance of international treaties and obligations and provides it with additional billions of dollars to continue its terrorist activities in the Middle East.


 

General Michael Flynn defense fund Fellow patriots, please listen to this short, inspiring message from General Flynn. General Michael Flynn exemplifies patriotism, courage, and love of God and country - despite some of his own countrymen relentlessly attacking him. Donations for his defense are greatly appreciated. If you can only give $5.00, please do so - every little bit helps. Thank you so much, and God bless. Letter from General Flynn. 


Here are the White House’s most egregious misinterpretations of the deal, looking at claims President Obama made during his remarks about the deal this morning.

1. “A comprehensive long-term deal with Iran that will prevent it from obtaining a nuclear weapon.”

The concluded deal does not prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon in the future. The deal imposes temporary restrictions on Iran’s illegal nuclear program.

After their expiration, Iran will have better resources to pursue more advanced nuclear technologies and potentially build a nuclear weapon faster than would be the case had sanctions remained in place.

The deal also allows Iran to obtain currently restricted materials to advance its ballistic missile program.

You Might Like

2. “Every pathway to a nuclear weapon is cut off.”

Iran is permitted to retain its enrichment infrastructure, including advanced centrifuges. The administration’s concession on uranium enrichment is a serious blow to a decade old principle of U.S. nonproliferation policy. The United States worked very hard in the past to prevent allies from developing indigenous uranium enrichment capability because technologies for uranium enrichment and weapons grade enrichment are the same.

Yet Iran, which developed this capability in defiance of its existing international obligations, is being rewarded for its bad behavior by lifting sanctions on its country, including sanctions concerning shipping, arms sales, transportation, banking and precious metal trade.

3. “The deal is in line with a tradition of American leadership.”

In reality, the deal undermines U.S. nonproliferation policy in the Middle East and in the world. The United States has demanded that other countries in the Middle East not pursue enrichment efforts.

While allies obliged, adversarial Iran is getting a deal that legitimizes its illegal uranium enrichment program.

Allies will demand the Iranian deal for themselves and the United States has given up any legitimacy it had in demanding otherwise. Saudi Arabia has already stated it will pursue a similar nuclear program. Others are likely to follow creating a less stable environment in already tense Middle East.

4. “America negotiated from a position of strength and principle.”

Time and again Obama conceded on key principles that would improve a chance that the United States is getting a deal beneficial to its national security interest. From a deal that stops Iran’s nuclear weapon pursuits to a deal that delays them at best (and speeds them up at worst). From a deal that allows anytime anywhere inspections given Iran’s past deception, to more restricted inspections that cannot interfere with Iran’s national security and military activities. Iran is not permitted under the Nonproliferation Treaty to pursue a nuclear program with military applications.

5. “The same options that are available to me today will be available to any U.S. president in the future.”

Obama is in a better position to negotiate Iran’s nuclear deal because of congressional and international sanctions that Obama is promising to dismantle. Any future president will have to deal with consequences of Obama’s concessions on all aspects of Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missile program.

Future U.S. presidents will have to deal with Iran that has hundreds of billion dollars more resources to pursue its nuclear program, access to modern technologies, and has been able to maintain nuclear know-how and infrastructure, both nuclear and ballistic missile, to threaten U.S. interests on an unprecedented scale.

6. “Consider what happens in a world without this deal. Without this deal, there is no scenario where the world joins us in sanctioning Iran until it completely dismantles its nuclear program.”

The world has already joined the United States in sanctions. An alternative to a no-deal is to continue them. After all, sanctions are the only reason why Iran negotiated to begin with.

A continuation of sanctions is a sound alternative to a bad deal that the Obama administration has negotiated. Continuing sanctions will limit Iran’s ability to fund terrorism across the Middle East, access to advanced technologies and rare materials that will allow Iran to further improve its nuclear and ballistic missile program, and the pressure of sanctions would give the United States more time to negotiate a better deal.

 

 


Please Spread the Word and Share This Post

TCP News is proud to be ranked #24 in the Top 40 Conservative Political Blogs

Viewpoints expressed herein are of the article’s author(s), or of the person(s) or organization(s) quoted or linked therein, and do not necessarily represent those of True Conservative Pundit

Another way you can support us is to purchase my book

Subscribe to my daily newsletter, and join hundreds of daily readers and receive news and relevant commentary

Don't forget to follow TCP News on Parler, USA Life, Gab, Facebook, and Twitter

If you value what you see on TCP News, please consider donating, any amount helps

donate to TCP News


TCP News Staffhttps://trueconservativepundit.com/
An oasis in a world of fake news - making news make sense again. Subscribe to the daily newsletter, and join hundreds of daily readers and receive news and relevant commentary. Follow TCP News on Facebook, USA LifeGab, SpreelyTwitter, and Pinterest

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related news

Politifact Is WRONG Again: Propaganda Outlet Claims ‘thin blue line flag’ is an ‘anti-Black Lives Matter Flag’

Politifact – the Left-leaning propaganda arm of the Poynter Institute is anything but truthful.   By TCP News Staff The "thin blue line flag," is a flag...

Headline News 10/30/2020

Good morning, we aim to start your day off right with relevant headline news that’s happening around the world, not to mention our own timely...