Wednesday, March 3, 2021
POLITICS U.S. Supreme Court Rules to Uphold Obamacare

U.S. Supreme Court Rules to Uphold Obamacare

Like the post? Why not make it Facebook official. ⇊

The Affordable Care Act survived its second major Supreme Court test Thursday, with the justices ruling 6-3 to uphold the law’s nationwide tax subsidies.


 

General Michael Flynn defense fund Fellow patriots, please listen to this short, inspiring message from General Flynn. General Michael Flynn exemplifies patriotism, courage, and love of God and country - despite some of his own countrymen relentlessly attacking him. Donations for his defense are greatly appreciated. If you can only give $5.00, please do so - every little bit helps. Thank you so much, and God bless. Letter from General Flynn. 


President Barack Obama reacted to the ruling, saying despite the many challenges, his signature law isn’t going anywhere.

“After more than 50 votes in Congress to repeal or weaken this law, after a presidential election based in part on preserving or repealing this law, after multiple challenges to this law before the Supreme Court, the Affordable Care Act is here to stay,” he said.

You Might Like

Opponents of Obamacare noted the law stipulates that people could get subsidies only when they signed up with health exchanges established at the state level – or as the law says “established by the state.”

They argued that that phrase cannot refer to exchanges established by the federal Health and Human Services Department, which oversees healthcare.gov.

But the court found the subsidies currently received by 8.7 million people are valid everywhere, including states that did not set up their own exchanges.

As he did in the first challenge to the law in 2012, Chief Justice John Roberts again voted with his liberal colleagues.

“Congress passed the Affordable Care Act to improve health insurance markets, not to destroy them,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the majority opinion. “The Act gives each State the opportunity to establish its own exchange, but provides that the federal government will establish the exchange if the state does not.”

Justice Antonin Scalia, however, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, issued a blistering dissent.

“Today’s interpretation is not merely unnatural; it is unheard of,” he wrote. “We should start calling this law SCOTUScare.”

“This case requires us to decide whether someone who buys insurance on an exchange established by the Secretary gets tax credits,” he continued.

“You would think the answer would be obvious — so obvious there would hardly be a need for the Supreme Court to hear a case about it,” Scalia added.

Scalia emphasized that his colleagues have now stepped in twice to save the law from worthy challenges, which is why he sees “SCOTUScare” as a more suitable nickname for the bill.

Meanwhile, Jay Sekulow, chief counsel of the American Center for Law and Justice,  which filed an amicus brief challenging Obamacare, called the court’s decision “disappointing and troubling.”

“Unfortunately, the majority of the court failed to apply the law as written,” he said. “The Court instead rewrote the law, something it did not have the constitutional power to do.”

“It is troubling that the high court backed the Obama administration’s overreach in its ongoing effort to rewrite or suspend portions of the ACA (Affordable Care Act), in violation of the separation of powers,” he added. “The court clearly over stepped its authority.”

Carrie Severino, chief counsel to the Judicial Crisis Network and former law clerk for Justice Thomas, reiterated Sekulow’s belief that the court did not have the constitutional power to rewrite the law.

“By upholding the Obama administration’s rewriting of Obamacare, the Court today took a hacksaw to Congress’s legislative powers. The Constitution makes clear that only Congress can write the laws, not the president or the court,” Severino said. “It’s a sad day for the Constitution when the clear terms of a statute can be “interpreted” away in the service of an aggressively lawless president.”

SOURCE: CBN News


Viewpoints expressed herein are of the article’s author(s), or of the person(s) or organization(s) quoted or linked therein, and do not necessarily represent those of TCP News

What you can do to help:

 

It is vitally important that we all take the time to like and share articles regardless of what site you are on. Conservative sites (like this one) cannot count on traffic from Facebook etc. any more. Subscribing is also important; this bypasses the censorship. The more that we can get the word out the better – and in order to continue bringing you content like this – we ALL need traffic in order to survive. Sign up for desktop notifications (the red bell symbol). Running a website is not only expensive, it also takes a lot of time and effort.

No one likes ads, but very few people will donate, hence the reason most of us have ads.

Besides donating and clicking on ads, you can make a purchase from our store and buy my book.

Don't forget to follow TCP News on Parler, USA Life, Gab, Facebook, and Twitter

TCP News is proud to be ranked #24 in the Top 40 Conservative Political Blogs

Thank you for helping us grow, we appreciate it!


LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related news

80 Million Vote Kamala Harris Returns Home: TWO People Greet Her

Like Being Lied To Americans? WHERE Are the 80 million votes? They DO NOT Exist!   By Bradlee Dean “Power is not only what you have, but...

Just a Matter of Time: Socialist Radical Kamala Harris – Madam President

Eventually, Biden's mental problems will be too severe to hide and even the liberal media will have to report on these issues   By Jeff Crouere (TCP...

Lyle Rapacki Interviews Rabbi Jack Zimmerman: Politics, Biden, Trump, and the Church

Our Nation was founded on Judeo-Christian principles, and these principles are intended to be eliminated!   By Lyle Rapacki (TCP News)  Lyle on Arizona Today interviews Rabbi Jack Zimmerman,...

The Coming ‘Great Reset’

Those who refuse this vaccine — this digital implant “mark” — will not be allowed to hold a job or to buy or sell   By...